Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.
Skip to main content

BACKGROUND: Myocardial T1-mapping is increasingly used in multicentre studies and trials. Inconsistent image analysis introduces variability, hinders differentiation of diseases, and results in larger sample sizes. We present a systematic approach to standardize T1-map analysis by human operators to improve accuracy and consistency. METHODS: We developed a multi-step training program for T1-map post-processing. The training dataset contained 42 left ventricular (LV) short-axis T1-maps (normal and diseases; 1.5 and 3 Tesla). Contours drawn by two experienced human operators served as reference for myocardial T1 and wall thickness (WT). Trainees (n = 26) underwent training and were evaluated by: (a) qualitative review of contours; (b) quantitative comparison with reference T1 and WT. RESULTS: The mean absolute difference between reference operators was 8.4 ± 6.3 ms (T1) and 1.2 ± 0.7 pixels (WT). Trainees' mean discrepancy from reference in T1 improved significantly post-training (from 8.1 ± 2.4 to 6.7 ± 1.4 ms; p < 0.001), with a 43% reduction in standard deviation (SD) (p = 0.035). WT also improved significantly post-training (from 0.9 ± 0.4 to 0.7 ± 0.2 pixels, p = 0.036), with 47% reduction in SD (p = 0.04). These experimentally-derived thresholds served to guide the training process: T1 (±8 ms) and WT (±1 pixel) from reference. CONCLUSION: A standardized approach to CMR T1-map image post-processing leads to significant improvements in the accuracy and consistency of LV myocardial T1 values and wall thickness. Improving consistency between operators can translate into 33-72% reduction in clinical trial sample-sizes. This work may: (a) serve as a basis for re-certification for core-lab operators; (b) translate to sample-size reductions for clinical studies; (c) produce better-quality training datasets for machine learning.

Original publication

DOI

10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.08.058

Type

Journal article

Journal

Int J Cardiol

Publication Date

31/08/2019

Keywords

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging, Image post-processing, Manual contouring, Quality assurance, Standardisation, T1 mapping