Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

We address the use of two informants in genetic studies and whether familial aggregation is similar for the three phenotypic subtypes of ADHD. Lifetime ADHD was diagnosed in a Dutch isolated population using parents and teachers as informants, creating two subgroups (one or two informants), then further divided into three phenotypic categories (inattentive, hyperactive/impulsive, combined). Genealogy was collected for all patients. Mean kinship coefficients for the subgroups were calculated. Fifteen of 26 children were linked to a common ancestor within 10 generations. The mean kinship coefficient of patients confirmed by two informants was significantly higher than in patients only scored positive by one informant (p = 0.03). All patients of the inattentive subtype were connected to a common ancestor, which was significantly higher (p = 0.03) than expected. Eighty-one percent of these patients derive of consanguineous marriages, also higher than expected. This means that recessive mutations may be involved in the inattentive subtype. These patients were more closely related than those with the other phenotypes (p<0.01). Our data suggests that using two informants in diagnosing ADHD helps identify a phenotype with a strong genetic component. The inattentive phenotype showed strong familial clustering and evidence of a recessive origin.

Original publication

DOI

10.1007/s10654-005-0366-7

Type

Journal article

Journal

Eur J Epidemiol

Publication Date

2005

Volume

20

Pages

789 - 794

Keywords

Adolescent, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Consanguinity, Female, Humans, Male, Netherlands, Pedigree, Phenotype